Recent news
- Workers Online Digest Edition - Issue 290
- When two sides collide
- ACTU MEDIA RELEASE: COMMUNITY PROTEST AGAINST NEW ...
- “Dog’s Breakfast” to make-a-meal of Workers’ Right...
- Young, Vulnerable Workers Left in the Lurch By Gov...
- Workers Online - Issue 288
- ILO Trial of Howard Govt Over Employee Rights
- Workers Online - Issue 287
- Summary of IR changes
- Workers Online - Issue 286
Past News
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- January 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- December 2007
- February 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- July 2008
Workers Online - Issue 291
|
Editorial
International Relations As the execution by Singapore of an Australian drug courier approaches, there has been an increasingly desperate public clamour to have anappeal heard by the International Court of Justice. It has spoken to an almost quaint faith that when one nation's legal system leaves us unsatisfied, surely there must be something we canappeal to, some higher authority to enforce justice. At the same time as we are looking for salvation from the hangman, a ruling this week by the United Nation's International Labour Organisation that the Howard Government's construction laws breach The ILO's Governing Body ruled the laws, which can lead to workers being jailed for refusing to disclose the contents of union meetings, were a breach of core labour standards as laid out in ILO Conventions87 and 98, both of which have been ratified by Australia. |